Friday, 21 November 2014

Vanguard raises the ETF-bar by lowering the cost

Until yesterday we've had to make some compromises when investing internationally using ETFs on the Australian Stock Exchange.

The lowest-cost option in terms of expense ratio has been the combination of VTS (US Total Market) and VEU (All-World ex-US).  But this requires investment in multiple funds, and these funds are cross-listed US funds which can make VEU, in particular, less tax-efficient.

The alternative was an all-in-one international ETF such as WXOZ (World ex Australia) or IOO (Global Top 100).  Unfortunately both of these come at a higher cost (around 0.4% p.a.) and are less diversified in their holdings.  IOO is also a US-listed fund.

Vanguard have now made their International Shares Index Fund (excluding Australia) available as an ETF.  This comes with a low expense ratio of 0.18% p.a. (0.21% p.a. for a currency hedged version), around half the price of competing ETFs.

ETFCode
Vanguard® MSCI Index International Shares ETFVGS
Vanguard® MSCI Index International Shares (Hedged) ETFVGAD

The underlying International Shares Index Funds have been running since 1997 with a strong record of tracking (or even exceeding) their index.  The funds track an index of over 1,500 stocks across 22 developed countries.

Liquidity of the ETF is not great, with spreads around the 0.25-0.3% mark.  However this is already comparable to WXOZ and also to the buy-sell spread of the underlying index fund.

Overall this is great value.  It may not suit everyone; for example, some may prefer separate allocations to the US and other countries, and it does not include Emerging Markets or Small Cap stocks.  But I view it on balance as the lowest-cost product overall in the market for international shares available today, so much so that I'll be editing my most recent post to include VGS.

Links:
Vanguard Exchange Traded Funds
MSCI World ex Australia Index

Saturday, 11 October 2014

Everything you need to know about financial planning (Australian Edition)

Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, has a one-page summary on everything you need to know about money in his Dilbert and the Way of the Weasel (2002):

Everything you need to know about financial planning

  • Make a will.
  • Pay off your credit cards.
  • Get term life insurance if you have a family to support.
  • Fund your 401(k) to the maximum.
  • Fund your IRA to the maximum.
  • Buy a house if you want to live in a house and you can afford it.
  • Put six months’ expenses in a money market fund.
  • Take whatever money is left over and invest 70% in a stock index fund and 30% in a bond fund through any discount broker and never touch it until retirement.
With a little translation this is entirely applicable to Australians.  I'll focus on unpacking the investment side but first do some of that translation and highlight some resources for those not on top of the personal finance side yet.  This guide will start out much more prescriptive for those who just want a simple solution before discussing more diverse choices for those who want to exercise them.

There are three levels of investing complexity I'll discuss.  Levels 1, 2 and 3 are not necessarily any better than each other.  Which you should take depends primarily on your goals and level of interest.

  • Level 0: Personal Finance: A pre-requisite before investing
  • Level 1: Investing automatically: I want to retire at the usual age using my super
  • Level 2: I might want to retire before 65: I probably need to save and invest outside super
  • Level 3: I love spreadsheets and want to (try to) optimise


Level 0: Personal Finance:
Before investing, get your house in order.  Paying off your credit cards is a must (and then make sure you have money set aside in advance to cover recurring bills like car insurance and save towards goals like a house deposit or the next holiday).

Having an emergency fund gives you a better chance of riding through life's ups and downs (Scott Pape suggests starting with at least $2,000 before attacking any other goals and then building up to 6 months). Life insurance is indeed particularly important if there are others depending on you.

If you find you need more detail or more support there are lots of free resources out there.  A good place to start is www.moneyminded.com.au.  For someone starting out, Scott Pape's book is good on personal finance (a bit dated on the investment side).  The UK edition is still available to purchase online (the Australian edition is out of print but the main differences are the links and resources at the back, and if you email them they'll send you the corresponding page.  You may be able to find the Australian edition at the library).  Similarly, Dave Ramsey's books are supposed to be good for those struggling with debt (but I wouldn't recommend them for investment advice).


Level 1: Investing automatically:
Once we've got our personal finances under control we can start to think about investment.  For any short-term goals such as a replacement car or a house deposit, stick to high interest online savings accounts (For the last year or so UBank USaver with Ultra has been the highest interest rate product I've found. If you have a mortgage you should use your offset account, so long as it won't tempt you to increase spending).  For "Level 1" let's assume you don't want to have to think about investing and your goal is to retire at normal retirement age.

When Scott Adams talks about funding your 401k or IRA, in Australia that would mean putting money into Superannuation.  For those workers who are not self-employed you should automatically be getting 9.5% of your salary in Super.  If you're under 40 then you've had 8%+ Super contributions for most of your working life.  This is a good start.

At present the maximum most younger people can contribute through salary sacrifice (including the employer contribution) is $30,000 p.a.  That is a lot for most people so if funding your Super to the maximum is out of reach aim to hit at least 15-20% of your salary (so an extra 5.5+% above the current minimum).  If you're approaching 40 and haven't been saving (whether inside or outside Super), or are older still you may need to contribute more than that to achieve your goals.

If you don't want to think about investing but just salary sacrifice (or make an after-tax contribution and use the co-contribution if on a lower salary) into a single fund here are my suggestions until age 55 (closer to retirement you may want to dial down the risk). Choose one of:

If you have a fund offered (or discounted) by your employer compare the insurance offered, fees and asset allocation.  If you're paying close to or more than 1% p.a. (before insurance costs) then it's too much.

If you have a current need for Life and TPD Insurance then I lean towards Australian Super (their costs are currently low and if you are eligible they let you increase the insured amount when you join with less messing around).  If you don't need (much) insurance then the Hostplus fund seems a very good deal.

Keep contributing 15-20% and ignore the ups and downs in the balance until age 55.  Once you're closer to the point where you'll need to access the money it may be worth looking for a financial advisor who can help understand the interaction between Super, taxes and age pensions. The industry funds above can refer you to a fee-for-service advisor or the information you can get from them over the phone or via your own online investigation may be sufficient.  You should make sure you're comfortable with the level of risk you're taking and may want to dial it down in the lead-up to retirement.


Level 2: I might want to retire before 65
The details of the Super system changes fairly frequently and rule changes understandably worry people.  It's not worth being too paranoid about it.  Just make sure some of your savings are outside Super if you think you'll want to retire before "retirement age".

If you want to retire around 65 my best guess is that Super will be the most effective way to save and invest.  If there's a chance you'll want or need to retire earlier then Super is still great for the later part of your retirement but you may not be able to access it at the start (for most people, at time of writing, the Super "preservation age" is currently 60 and there are rumours of it eventually increasing to 65.  I wouldn't expect people currently close to retirement to be impacted though).

2.1 The simple approach
If you are looking to retire a few years earlier (or at least have that option) but don't want to add much complexity here's the simplest approach:

  • Figure out your likely annual expenses in retirement
  • For each extra year of retirement before 65 save towards an extra amount equal your expected expenses in an online savings account.  For instance if you want to retire at 60 a reasonable target is five times your annual expenses.  
  • [If you want to retire much earlier you should probably add a bit more complexity with some stock index funds outside super (see below).  This will hopefully mitigate the risk of inflation.]
  • Keep saving in Super as above (or more, if you can)
If you have a mortgage, paying more off or putting more in the offset account is even better (so long as you don't redraw or use large chunks of the offset account for casual spending money).  While you have a mortgage prioritising that will likely be more financially effective than the other financial investments below.


    2.2 A bit more complexity
    Follow Scott Adams' advice modified for Australian conditions.  After setting aside our emergency funds and money for expenses coming over the next few years in an online savings account, for the investments outside super the lowest-fee all-in-one option I've found is:
    • Colonial FirstChoice Wholesale Multi-Index Balanced
    The fund automatically rebalances to 70% shares and 30% bonds and cash periodically. With this option you can set up a regular investment plan to automatically invest monthly.  You can also reinvest the distributions automatically (although you'll still need to pay taxes on the distributions).

    An alternative is the Vanguard® LifeStrategy® Growth Fund.  The fees are higher for the first $50,000 but are lower after that point.  If you're looking at investing for the long-term and expect to have over $100,000 invested long before retirement age then this may actually be a more cost-effective option.

    I'd like to mention investment bonds as another alternative here if you're investing for 10+ years in the future and in a high tax bracket. But if you use them, make sure you understand the product, don't pay more than 1% p.a. in fees and don't pay a percentage commission to an advisor.  They can be a bit complicated in the rules that apply so be even more careful if you go down this path.  A low-cost option with a similar balance of 70% growth assets and 30% defensive assets is the Austock Life Imputation Bond using the Dimensional Multi-Factor Growth Portfolio as the investment fund.


    2.3 Lower costs with some more complexity
    If you're willing to face investing in individual funds, for the savings outside super,
    • Invest 70% in stock index funds
    • Invest 30% in a high-interest online savings account (or an Australian bond fund)
    For Australians, the best high-interest online savings accounts currently pay more than the expected yield of Australian Government bond funds, with a government guarantee up to $250,000 per person per bank and without any of the costs.  It may not always be the case that these have better expected returns than bonds but at the moment it's a good deal.

    For the stock index funds if you're investing more than five thousand dollars per year in stock funds consider using Exchange Traded Funds (ETF).  These are purchased through an (online) brokerage just like regular Australian shares.  If you don't want to think too much about it a "good enough" option is:
    If you're a fan of them you can replace the Australian Shares ETF with an old-school listed investment company like AFIC, Argo or Milton.  To keep costs down invest at least a few thousand dollars at a time (saving up in your online savings account). Also, rebalance using new money (invest new money and dividend payments into whichever fund has the lower balance to try to keep the relative proportions of different investments stable).

    If you can kickstart your savings a bit ($5,000 starting minimum) but want to be able to invest in smaller amounts periodically, do the same thing with Colonial FirstChoice Wholesale Investments:
    • Half in Colonial First State Wholesale Index Australian Share 
    • Half in Colonial First State Wholesale Index Global Share
    Like the Multi-Index Balanced fund you can set this up for automatic monthly investing. You could also use their Wholesale Index Australian Bond fund or even the similarly priced Wholesale Australian Bond fund to replace the high-interest online savings account.  As a helpful commenter pointed out, this will be beneficial during times of falling interest rates but will give lower returns when interest rates are rising.

    If you really don't want to have to think about where to invest your share allocation, for about twice the price you can use an all-in-one investment (keeping the online savings account for your stable bond-like assets). Two all-in-one investments that are worth your consideration are:
    The one cautionary note when separating out your share investments from your fixed interest is to keep in mind your appetite for risk.  Global share markets can drop quickly and substantially.  To date, in the US, UK and Australia they've always recovered in the longer-term.  But if seeing your available wealth fluctuate will impair your ability to sleep well at night, seek out strategies to help.  One I'm familiar with is to lower the percentage you put into shares and know that you always have the online savings account component safe. Another is to use more conservative all-in-one funds instead of separating out the cash and shares which will smooth out the fluctuations you see (but likely add some expense).  Options to consider in this case include the Colonial FirstChoice Wholesale Multi-Index Conservative, FirstChoice Wholesale Multi-Index Diversified or FirstChoice Wholesale Multi-Index Balanced.


    Level 3: I love spreadsheets and want to (try to) optimise
    If you've come this far you're really heading towards the domain of asset allocation.  If you don't want to get any more complex then call it a day with one of the simpler approaches. Keep in mind there's no guarantee a more precise asset allocation or asset location will actually lead to better results.


    A starting point is one of my posts on Asset Allocation.  However if you really want to make a (positive) difference with a detail-oriented approach it's important to learn more about the history, theory, psychology and business of the market.  My favourite book covering these is The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio by William J. Bernstein.  A good free resource online is investingroadmap.wordpress.com.  You'll also need to figure out how best to apply the usually US-focused  (or Canadian) resources to Australia.  I'm not a tax expert and can't give tax advice. But I can point you in the direction of resources I've found useful and rules-of-thumb to consider further.  Some of my thoughts are below:

    • Learn to think of all your savings and investments which are for a single goal (e.g. retirement) as one whole.  Psychologically separating your resources in Super and outside Super limits your ability to optimise, particularly in terms of taxation.
    • Due to preferential tax rates, depending on your particular tax situation, it may be advantageous to hold more of your defensive assets in Super (franked dividends, foreign tax credits and capital gains discounts all work similarly inside and outside super for shares, while cash and bond interest tends to get a better tax treatment in super for those on average or higher incomes). Similarly, consider where you put any diversified property allocation for taxation purposes.
    • Diversify across asset types (cash or bonds and shares) and diversify internationally.
    • The Vanguard 2014 Index Chart and Index Portfolio Calculator can give you an idea of how different assets have performed historically.  But when they say "Past performance is not an indication of future performance", it's not just a line.  For example, with government bond (fund) yields currently close to 3%, expecting the 8.5% earned on average since 1970 is unrealistic.
    • The enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan.  Find a plan you can stick to for the long term.  On average, constantly adjusting your portfolio is a costly game.  And allocating that last 2% to small cap frontier emerging market value stocks will have far less impact on your overall results than the basic split between fixed interest assets like cash vs. more volatile, higher expected growth assets such as shares.

    I'll add to this list and the resources below as I realise things I missed but, since most of my posts are about the more granular details, I wanted most of this post to be more helpful for those who don't want investment to be so complex.  As always, feedback is greatly appreciated.

    Further reading
    If You Can: free booklet by William Bernstein (US-oriented but the same principles apply)
    A valuable free guide investingroadmap.wordpress.com (again US-oriented)
    Helpful places to discuss asset allocation and get input from others are the forums:
    Bogleheads.org
    mrmoneymustache.com/forum/investor-alley/

    Sunday, 21 September 2014

    Asset Allocation redux

    I've posted some of this before but was about to use it elsewhere.  I thought it might be a good summary to keep here too.  I greatly appreciate any feedback - I know it's not the easiest read.

    Saturday, 20 September 2014

    Australian Super, MySuper and the fee debates

    In my last post I noted that AustralianSuper's fees on their Indexed Diversified option increased last year.  While this was disappointing, we should keep things in perspective and look at the big picture.

    At the end of the day, 0.21% p.a. is still extremely inexpensive for a well-diversified set of index funds. Other than the the exceptional offering from HostPlus there's really nothing better in the marketplace. And a cursory investigation into the availability of automatic insurance on joining suggests that AustralianSuper has more to offer if you want to have Life and TPD insurance in your super and want to minimise the hassle of a screening process (unless your employer uses HostPlus as their default - lucky you!)  For my Mum I've recommended HostPlus as she doesn't need such insurance at this stage.  For my partner I'm more likely to suggest AustralianSuper.

    This had me thinking more generally about where we are in Australia with fees on Superannuation funds.  Since the introduction of MySuper funds at the start of the year fees on average don't appear to have dropped that much.  But it is a start - fees on default products have improved but there are still a lot of legacy products and expensive products left in the marketplace.

    As an indicator, the big banks all have basic Super products with asset-based fees in the range of 0.5% - 0.8% p.a.  Even AMP now has a MySuper product at 0.65% p.a. (but be aware that any customisation at AMP becomes increasingly expensive).  While that's still more than HostPlus or AustralianSuper it's a vast improvement in just a few years.

    So if things have improved, what are the big (and smaller) fee issues out there now?

    Firstly, existing balances in default products don't have to be converted to MySuper products until 2017.  This gives unscrupulous funds some time to extract more in fees.  There even appears to be cases where a separate company has been set up with a more competitive MySuper fund.  What this means is that existing balances can't be rolled into the more competitive fund automatically, giving another opportunity to get/keep people in less competitive funds.

    Secondly, there is the potential for high fees to be charged by affiliated planners to put consumers into higher-fee funds.  It is unclear how widespread this is or will be.  But the bottom line is if you're paying more than 1% p.a. you'd better be very clear on what value you're getting for that money. There are places where a financial planner can add value.  But by itself choosing an asset allocation should not be that expensive or needed so frequently that you're paying an annual fee. What my parents did was to see a planner associated with one of their industry funds, pay up-front (still much less than 1% as a once-off) for a financial plan when they were close to retirement, and pay a few hundred dollars for a follow-up every few years when needed.

    Thirdly, perhaps a smaller issue, is fees versus value.  I'm unconvinced of the value of active management of equities, and there's plenty of evidence to support that particularly for the large stocks that form the majority of equities in Super.  But accessing assets like unlisted infrastructure and property are a more expensive proposition and may provide some diversification benefits. Reasonable people can disagree on whether it is worth paying a bit more for these. However it is clear that fees of 2% p.a. as still exist in some retail products will almost never be worth paying; they will struggle to overcome the drag of those fees and there are just better-value products in the market.

    So if you want such assets in your Super, I won't judge you (I even had posts on some in the past). Just include them in a cost-effective manner.  For example, Australian Super's Conservative Balanced fund (which doesn't seem all that conservative) charged 0.41% + 0.03% in performance fees last year and has a target ('strategic asset allocation') of 25% in Direct Property and Infrastructure.  That's the best value I've found for such an allocation but most Industry Super funds will have a reasonable quantity of Property and Infrastructure while keeping fees in-line with the banks' pure index products (and as with Australian Super many can beat the banks on pure index products for those of us so inclined).  And if you want something in-between, a mix of AustralianSuper's Conservative Balanced and Index DIversified funds can be used. For example 40% Conservative Balanced and 60% Index Diversified will get you a target allocation of 10% in unlisted assets.  All for about 0.3% p.a.

    Fees might not be everything but they can make a big difference to the final balance which funds your retirement income.  Be aware of what you are paying and make sure you are getting value for money.

    Sunday, 17 August 2014

    The Best Deals in Superannuation - Product Updates

    It's been a year since I first posted and there are a few fee changes to report.

    Firstly, Australian Super have updated their fees for the 12 months to June 2014:

    Investment fee
    Indexed Diversified0.21%
    Australian Shares0.30%
    Australian Fixed Interest0.18%
    International Fixed Interest0.24%
    Cash0.06%

    The most relevant change for our needs is for their Index Diversified (which now has their baseline asset allocation with 70% in growth assets) from 0.11% p.a. to 0.21% p.a. in fees. International Fixed Interest also changed from 0.13% to 0.24% and there were other smaller changes above.

    This fee increase is disappointing.  Australian Super is the largest fund in Australia and for Index products and standard asset classes should be able to leverage substantial economies of scale.

    On the other end of the spectrum, Hostplus are funding their Operational Risk Financial Requirement via the 'Administration Reserve' rather than additional fees from 30 June 2014. They've also largely maintained their low investment fees with only small changes below. This gives them an industry leading low-cost and index offering for most asset classes (their cheapest separate international share fund charges 0.47% p.a. but they do include an international component in their Indexed Balanced fund which should suffice for most).

    Investment fee
    Indexed Balanced0.05% 0.04%
    Cash0.02%
    Macquarie Investment Management – Australian Fixed Interest*0.00%
    BlackRock Asset Management –  International Fixed Interest
    Diversified Fixed Interest
    0.19% 0.24%
    0.25%

    Industry Super Property Trust – Property0.33% 0.36%
    Industry Funds Management – Australian Shares0.06% 0.11%

    Note * the Macquarie Investment Management – Australian Fixed Interest option is actually Macquarie agreeing to "Guarantee the return of the UBS Composite Bond Index (All Maturities)", not a direct investment in Fixed Interest.
    EDIT October 2014: Hostplus have now updated their most recent financial-year fees in their member guide.  I've updated above.  Sadly some of the fees are higher but the Indexed Balanced is even lower!

    In the past 12 month there has been an explosion of providers offering 'SMSF-Lite' direct investment options into ETFs and Term Deposits.  If you're using another provider it would be great to hear about it.  From perusing the different providers, most I've found don't offer better value than was already offered (with the early providers Australian Super and ING Direct) so probably appeal more to members who want to stick with their existing fund than people looking to switch.

    The best I've found of the new breed of these direct investment options is again HostPlus with their ChoicePlus offering.  Their ETF List can be found on their website at the end of this article.  They offer a better range of Australian Share ETFs than ING Direct but not as wide a range of International Share ETFs (the latter being comparable to Australian Super with just iShares providing International Share ETFs).

    Finally, before making any changes remember to consider your insurance needs.  For low balances the cost differences in Life and TPD insurance can be larger than the differences in investment fees, so make sure you'll be able to get the coverage you want (get it approved if needed before closing your old super) at a reasonable price.

    Links:

    Tuesday, 18 March 2014

    ETFs for the New Year

    A few new ETF choices are now available on the Australian Stock Exchange.  They're not for me...yet...but are worth keeping an eye on.

    Firstly we're finally able to get better access to emerging markets.  iShares have had some relatively pricey ETFs available for a while.  Now Vanguard and SSGA have joined the party:

    Vanguard® FTSE Emerging Markets Shares ETF (VGE) has an Expense Ratio of 0.48%
    SPDR® S&P ®Emerging Markets Fund has an Expense Ratio of 0.65%

    The Vanguard ETF is cheaper but, like the iShares ETF, it's not clear to me if we'll be able to claim back (non-US) foreign tax withheld.  The SPDR fund has a similar Expense Ratio to the iShares ETF but the fund, as far as I can tell, is Australian domiciled and does not hold an underlying US fund like the Vanguard and iShares ETFs.  In principle foreign tax withheld may be claimed as a tax offset but this will depend on your individual tax situation.

    The other two Australian funds are interesting from a diversification perspective.  I've long been concerned that we're not diversified enough.  When we invest in an ASX200 or ASX300 ETF or managed fund typically around 50% of the fund is in the top 10 ASX stocks (overweight banks and resources) and around 70% in the top 25.  Most of our risk and return comes from a relatively small number of stocks.  Similarly, an Australian Property ETF or index fund (at time of writing) will usually have around 1/3rd of its weighting just in the Westfield Group and Westfield Retail Trust.  Market Vectors are attempting to mitigate these with the following funds:

    The Market Vectors Australian Equal Weight ETF (Expense Ratio 0.35%) tracks a quarterly rebalanced index of the top 50-70 stocks.  While it is still heavily weighted towards financials it may suffer less idiosyncratic (single stock) risk than a market-capitalisation weighted ETF.  One concern I have are that it only rebalances quarterly, so can get quite far away from equal-weight in a short time (at time of writing, after only a couple of weeks of ETF operation, Newcrest Mining was sitting at 1.84% of assets while equal weight is closer to 1.3%).  The bigger concern with that rebalancing is that it will lead to fund turnover so has the potential for short term capital gains which should be passed on to ETF holders.  Until it builds a track record I'd be concerned about holding it unless perhaps in a Self Managed Superannuation Fund in the pension phase (where tax is not an issue).

    The Market Vectors Australian Property ETF (Expense Ratio 0.35%) caps individual holdings to 10%.  The two Westfield entities still add up to 20% but it does seem an improvement.  Turnover may be an issue, although not to the same extent as the equal weight ETF.  I'd still only be inclined to hold this in Superannuation but mainly because taxation of Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts is relatively messy.